Compare · Monito vs QA.tech

QA.tech alternative: Monito vs QA.tech

QA.tech runs tests from natural-language goals and builds a feature graph by crawling the application. Source Monito focuses on desktop Chromium journeys. Start with the platforms you need and the way your team will maintain the expected results.

Competitor facts last checked: 2026-10-23.

QA.tech facts checked 2026-10-23

QA.tech public facts, checked 2026-10-23
 QA.techSource
PriceNot published. Starter, Growth and Enterprise all say Talk to us.Source
Plan accessGrowth includes PR testing, scheduled test plans and MCP, API and CLI access. Starter does not include those capabilities.Source
PlatformsWeb, native mobile, API and voice testing.Source
Test definitionsThe API or CLI can return JSON definitions with names, goals, expected results and steps. Goal-only cases return an empty steps array.Source
Hosted MCPhttps://api.qa.tech/v1/mcp uses OAuth and lets coding agents list test cases, start runs and read results.Source
EvaluationA guided POC starts with critical journeys. Its price and length are not published; no free tier is listed.Source

How the workflows differ

QA.tech compared with Monito
 QA.techMonito
AuthoringDescribe paths in chat. The assistant analyzes the app, creates tests and proposes suggestions for approval. PR review can create tests for new features and run relevant tests. SourceDescribe the browser journey and expected result in plain English.
Where tests liveTest definitions live in QA.tech and can be exported as JSON through the API or CLI. These definitions are not runnable test code in your repository. SourceScenarios saved in Monito, with Markdown export. No Playwright code export.
Pricing modelNot published. Only test executions count toward a plan, under a fair-usage policy. Creation, chat and maintenance are included. SourcePro is $79/month for 700 credits. Test runs and Discovery spend credits; see the offer below.
TriggersRun a test plan manually, from CI after a deploy or on a cron schedule. Documented integrations include GitHub, GitLab and an HTTP API. SourceWeb app, CLI and MCP. Schedules, deploy webhooks and GitHub Actions are available; plan requirements are below.
MaintenanceQA.tech says its agents work toward goals rather than fixed steps, so tests adapt as the product changes. SourceYou update the scenario when the expected behavior changes. The agent chooses browser actions during each run.

Where QA.tech is the better fit

Choose QA.tech when the same product needs to cover native mobile, APIs or voice alongside web journeys. Source

Choose QA.tech when you want PR review to create tests for new features and run the relevant tests for the change. Source

Choose QA.tech Enterprise when SSO and SSH-tunnel access to a private network are procurement requirements. Source

Where Monito fits

Use Monito when the target is a web app and you want to describe the expected behavior, run a hosted browser and inspect the resulting checks.

The Monito MCP server lets an AI tool run Monito directly: it checks a URL and expectation in a real browser, returns a verdict with evidence, and lets you save the check as a reusable test.

The hosted server at /api/mcp rejects localhost and private-network URLs; use a deployed preview there.

For a deployed app, schedules and deploy hooks can rerun the same scenario. For work on localhost, the CLI or local MCP server opens a per-run tunnel to the hosted browser.

Monito runs desktop Chromium. It does not test native mobile apps, provide Firefox or WebKit runs, or export Playwright code.

Run a check · Save a scenario · Run on deploys

Monito pricing

Pro is $79/month for 700 credits, counted on the pricing page as about 600 test runs and 5 Discoveries. A test run is 1 credit and Discovery is 20, so the same 700 credits are 700 test runs if you skip Discovery. Team is $199/month for 1,800 credits (about 1,500 tests and 15 Discoveries). Yearly plans cost ten monthly payments ($790 and $1,990) and grant twelve months of credits upfront. If Monito caused the error, that run is free.

50 free test credits every month. Your balance refills to 50 on the 1st of each month (UTC), counting credits reserved by running tests. Unused credits are not added again; purchased credits are kept. Your signup credits count as the first month. Free includes one daily schedule. Verify your email to receive monthly refills. Any schedule other than that one daily schedule, a deploy webhook, GitHub Actions, and a public status page need Pro.

Plans and credit usage

Published benchmark evidence

On the held-out benchmark measured 2026-10-12, the verdict was right on 58 of 60 runs, with 0 false passes in 30 chances (95% upper bound 9.6%). The held-out set covers 5 open-source apps.

On our own corpus, measured 2026-10-05, the verdict was right on 110 of 111 runs, with 0 false passes in 57 chances (95% upper bound 5.2%), and 88 of 111 verdicts cited the required evidence. Neither set is a promise about your app. The held-out set is a small number of real bugs in open-source apps. The corpus is ours. The method and the limits are on the reliability page.

Read the method, results and limits

These public reports are benchmark runs from our team's own corpus. They show a working web journey and a related failure. They are not customer results or a head-to-head evaluation of QA.tech.

Try a browser journey

Choose a flow, state what should happen and review the evidence from the run.

Run a Monito check

Questions

Does QA.tech publish prices or a free plan?

Not published. Every tier directs buyers to talk to the team. No free tier is listed, and the POC's price and length were not verified. Source

Does QA.tech have a hosted MCP server?

Yes. Its OAuth MCP server lets clients such as Claude Code, Cursor and Codex list test cases, start runs and read results. Source

Can we keep QA.tech test definitions?

Yes. The API and CLI can export JSON definitions for use in another test management tool. Goal-only tests have an empty steps array; this is not a repository of runnable test scripts. Source

What does Monito's free offer include?

50 free test credits every month. Your balance refills to 50 on the 1st of each month (UTC), counting credits reserved by running tests. Unused credits are not added again; purchased credits are kept. Your signup credits count as the first month. Free includes one daily schedule. Verify your email to receive monthly refills. Any schedule other than that one daily schedule, a deploy webhook, GitHub Actions, and a public status page need Pro.

Sources

Other comparisons

All comparisons · Checkly · Octomind · TesterArmy · Momentic · QA Wolf · mabl · testRigor · Reflect · Playwright · Cypress · TestSprite · QA.tech · Bug0 · Stably · Pricing · Reliability