The 12 Best Bug Reporting Tools for Dev Teams in 2026

A vague bug report lands in your backlog: 'The button doesn't work.' What follows is a familiar, time-wasting cycle of questions. Which button? What page were you on? What did you do before it broke? This communication gap between QA, product, support, and engineering costs hours, delays critical fixes, and introduces friction into your workflow. The solution isn't just better communication; it's better context.

Modern bug reporting tools are designed to eliminate this back-and-forth by automatically capturing the full story behind every issue. They bundle crucial diagnostic data like user actions, console logs, network requests, and visual session replays into a single, actionable report. This shifts the process from a frustrating guessing game to a precise, efficient operation. Beyond just collecting reports, managing and actioning all forms of user input is crucial for product health. Explore how comprehensive customer feedback management software can organize this process and prevent the inefficiencies that lead to wasted hours.

This guide dives deep into the 12 best bug reporting tools available today. We cut through the marketing noise to provide a clear, honest assessment of each platform, complete with screenshots and direct links. You will learn about their key features, ideal users, integrations, and pricing to help you select the perfect tool. Our goal is to equip your team with the right solution to stop chasing information and start shipping fixes faster.

1. Monito

Monito stands out as a powerful, developer-first bug reporting tool designed to eliminate the friction between identifying a bug and fixing it. Delivered as a simple Chrome extension, it excels at capturing the entire context of a user session, transforming ambiguous user feedback into actionable, developer-ready tickets with a single click. This focus on deep technical telemetry makes it an exceptional choice for engineering, QA, and product teams that need to diagnose complex front-end issues quickly.

The platform’s core strength is its comprehensive data collection. It automatically records not just what the user sees via screen recording, but also the underlying technical story: every click, navigation event, console log, and network request, including both HTTP and WebSocket traffic. This complete dataset is then analyzed by a built-in AI that surfaces likely root causes and suggests next steps, dramatically shortening the triage and debugging process. The result is a highly structured report that can be exported directly to Jira or Linear, or packaged as a portable ZIP file for easy sharing. For teams looking to streamline their internal processes, this can significantly improve how they manage the software bug life cycle.

Key Features & Analysis

Complete Session Replay: Monito captures the full story by combining visual screen recordings with a complete log of user actions, console errors, and network activity. This is invaluable for QA and developers trying to reproduce inconsistent bugs.
AI-Powered Insights: The tool goes beyond simple data capture by using AI to analyze session data. It highlights potential causes of errors and provides actionable recommendations, which helps junior developers and speeds up diagnosis for seniors.
One-Click Ticket Generation: Its ability to auto-generate structured, detailed tickets for Jira and Linear saves immense time. It standardizes bug reports, ensuring developers receive all necessary information without back-and-forth communication.
Scalable Architecture: Monito supports teams of all sizes. The Pro and Enterprise tiers offer unlimited history, custom S3 storage for enhanced security and data control, and dedicated support, making it a viable long-term solution.

Pricing & Ideal Use Cases

Monito’s pricing scales with team needs. The Hobby plan ($29/mo) is suited for solo developers or freelancers, while the Pro plan ($49/mo) is the best fit for most teams, offering unlimited history and integrations. The Enterprise tier ($79/mo per seat) provides advanced features like custom AI models and dedicated support for large organizations.

Pros	Cons
Captures complete session context: clicks, console, network traffic (HTTP & WebSocket), and screen recordings.	Only supports Chromium-based browsers (Chrome, Edge, etc.); no native Firefox or Safari support.
One-click, developer-ready reports with direct exports to Linear and Jira reduce manual work and miscommunication.	The 7-day session history on the entry-level Hobby tier may be too short for some project cycles.
AI-powered analysis accelerates debugging by suggesting probable causes and next steps.	Costs can increase for larger teams needing multiple seats on the Pro or Enterprise plans.
Scales from solo developers to enterprise teams with features like custom S3 storage and dedicated support.

Best for: Front-end and full-stack development teams, QA engineers, and product managers who need to resolve bugs faster with complete technical context. Its deep diagnostic capabilities are particularly useful for complex web applications and SaaS platforms.

Visit Monito

2. Jam.dev

Jam.dev excels at closing the communication gap between reporters and engineers with its browser-based approach. It operates as a simple browser extension that allows anyone, from QA testers to customer support agents, to create a developer-ready bug report in just one click. This makes it one of the best bug reporting tools for teams who need rich technical context without forcing non-technical users to manually gather logs or steps.

The tool automatically captures everything an engineer needs to debug an issue: a screenshot or video, reproducible steps, console logs, network requests, and complete device information. A standout feature is "Instant Replay," which records the last 30 seconds of browser activity, allowing users to report a bug after it has already happened.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: QA, product managers, customer support, and front-end developers who primarily work on web applications.
Standout Feature: The automatic inclusion of console and network logs with every report significantly reduces back-and-forth communication.
Limitations: While it has an iOS SDK, its core strength is browser-based reporting, making it less suited for native mobile or desktop app debugging.
Pricing: Jam offers a Free plan with basic features, a Team plan at $10/user/month for unlimited reports, and an Enterprise plan for advanced security and support.

This approach ensures the initial bug submission is detailed enough to be actionable, which is a core principle in understanding how to write effective bug reports. It pushes reports directly into popular issue trackers like Jira, Linear, and GitHub, fitting smoothly into existing workflows.

3. Marker.io

Marker.io positions itself as a visual feedback and bug reporting tool built for web agencies and teams who need a seamless way to collect input directly on websites. It allows users, including clients and non-technical stakeholders, to report issues by clicking on a page and annotating it, eliminating the need for them to create an account or navigate complex forms. This on-page approach is excellent for gathering contextual feedback during design reviews or user acceptance testing.

The platform automatically captures technical metadata with each visual report, such as the browser version, OS, screen size, and console logs. A key benefit is its session replay feature, which provides a video of the user's actions leading up to the report. This combination of visual annotation and technical data makes it one of the best bug reporting tools for workflows that heavily involve client feedback.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Web design agencies, marketing teams, and developers who need to collect feedback from external stakeholders and clients directly on live or staging websites.
Standout Feature: Strong two-way integrations with tools like Jira, Trello, and Linear, which sync conversation threads and report statuses so developers never have to leave their issue tracker.
Limitations: Its primary focus is on website feedback collection, making it less suitable for deep native mobile app or desktop software debugging.
Pricing: The Starter plan is $39/month for up to 3 projects, the Team plan is $79/month for 10 projects, and the Company plan at $159/month offers unlimited projects.

Marker.io also includes privacy-conscious features like data masking for sensitive information in session replays, making it a reliable choice for teams with SOC 2 or other compliance needs. By simplifying the process of taking and annotating a visual report, it helps avoid common issues like users struggling with how to properly screenshot for Safari or other browsers.

4. BugHerd

BugHerd offers a unique, visual-first approach to bug reporting that feels like using sticky notes on a live website. It excels in environments where non-technical stakeholders, like clients or marketing teams, need to provide feedback directly on web pages. Users can simply point, click, and describe an issue on a specific page element, turning what would be a confusing email into a precise, actionable task for developers.

This tool is particularly effective for user acceptance testing (UAT), design reviews, and content QA. BugHerd's browser extension or an embedded JavaScript snippet creates a feedback sidebar on the site, where users can leave comments, attach files, or even record video feedback. All reports automatically capture key metadata like the browser, OS, and screen resolution, eliminating the need to ask for basic details.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Web design agencies, marketing teams, and anyone managing website projects with frequent client or stakeholder feedback.
Standout Feature: The ability for unlimited guests (clients/stakeholders) to provide visual feedback directly on the website without needing a login makes it one of the best bug reporting tools for collaborative projects.
Limitations: Its strength in visual feedback means it lacks the deep technical context of developer-centric tools, such as console logs or network requests, for complex application bugs.
Pricing: Plans start at $39/month for the Standard plan. The Premium plan at $129/month adds more members and projects, and a Deluxe plan is available at $229/month for larger teams. A 14-day free trial is available for all plans.

BugHerd integrates cleanly with tools like Trello, Slack, and Jira, pushing feedback into existing workflows. Its focus on tying every report to a visual element on the page makes it incredibly intuitive for non-developers, significantly speeding up the feedback cycle for web projects.

5. Usersnap

Usersnap distinguishes itself by combining customer feedback, user surveys, and bug reporting into a single platform. It operates through a highly customizable feedback widget that can be embedded directly into a web application, allowing end-users and internal teams to submit visual bug reports with screenshots and screen recordings without leaving the site. This makes it an excellent choice for teams that want to centralize user communication and QA workflows in one place.

The platform excels at collecting qualitative data alongside technical reports. While users annotate screenshots, Usersnap can automatically capture metadata and, on higher-tier plans, console logs. This dual focus on user sentiment and technical detail provides a more complete picture of an issue's impact, bridging the gap between product management and engineering. It's one of the best bug reporting tools for organizations looking to scale their user feedback programs beyond simple bug collection.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Product teams, customer success, and QA professionals who need to collect and manage both bug reports and general user feedback.
Standout Feature: The ability to deploy micro-surveys and feedback forms from the same widget used for bug reporting, creating a unified user communication channel.
Limitations: Key technical features like console error reporting and mobile SDKs are gated behind more expensive plans, making the entry-level tiers less powerful for development teams.
Pricing: Usersnap offers several tiers starting with the Startup plan at €69/month for 2 team members. Higher tiers like Company (€129/month) and Premium (€249/month) add more features and user seats. An Enterprise plan is also available.

With over 50 integrations, including Jira, Azure DevOps, and Slack, Usersnap effectively channels feedback and bug reports into existing development and support pipelines. Its robust project organization and role-based access controls also make it a scalable solution for larger companies managing multiple products or feedback initiatives.

6. Bird Eats Bug

Bird Eats Bug offers a lightweight yet powerful solution for session recording and bug reporting, designed to capture screen, console, and network data with minimal friction. Its key differentiator is the Web SDK, which allows teams to embed a bug reporting widget directly into their application. This enables end-users to submit highly detailed reports, including technical logs, without needing to install a browser extension or even sign in.

This in-product approach makes Bird Eats Bug one of the best bug reporting tools for gathering high-quality feedback directly from customers. When a user encounters an issue, they can launch the recorder, replicate the problem, and submit a report that automatically includes the critical diagnostic data engineers need. This removes the common barrier of asking non-technical users to manually collect console logs or network information.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Teams that need to collect detailed bug reports from external users, such as customers or clients, as well as internal QA and support staff.
Standout Feature: The Web SDK allows for in-product bug reporting from anyone without requiring a browser extension, making it perfect for capturing customer-reported issues.
Limitations: The per-user pricing model can become costly for larger teams, and it lacks the deeper performance analytics found in full-scale observability platforms.
Pricing: Bird Eats Bug offers a Free plan with limited features, a Startup plan at $12/user/month for unlimited recordings, and custom Business and Enterprise plans.

The tool integrates smoothly with project management software like Jira, Linear, GitHub, and Trello, pushing developer-ready reports directly into existing workflows. Its focus on simplifying external feedback makes it a strong choice for SaaS companies and product teams focused on user experience.

7. LogRocket

LogRocket goes beyond simple bug reporting by combining high-fidelity session replay with front-end performance monitoring and analytics. It allows developers to reproduce complex user-reported issues by watching a video-like replay of a real user's session. This makes it one of the best bug reporting tools for teams that need to understand not just what broke, but the exact sequence of user actions that led to the failure.

The platform captures the complete technical context alongside the visual replay, including the state of the DOM, console logs, and network activity. This rich, developer-friendly view is exceptionally strong at showing what users did to trigger a bug, which significantly reduces triage time and the need for back-and-forth communication.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Front-end and full-stack developers who need to debug elusive, user-specific front-end issues.
Standout Feature: Its high-fidelity session replay provides a pixel-perfect reconstruction of user sessions, complete with all underlying technical data.
Limitations: The pricing model scales with session volume, which can become expensive for high-traffic applications. Its broader analytics features can also add complexity to the initial setup.
Pricing: LogRocket offers a Free plan with 1,000 sessions/month, a Team plan at $19/user/month plus session costs, and custom Professional and Enterprise plans.

By providing a complete picture of the user experience, LogRocket helps teams proactively identify and fix errors before they are ever formally reported. Its ability to connect user friction points with underlying code issues makes it a powerful asset for improving both application stability and overall product quality.

8. OpenReplay

OpenReplay stands out as one of the best bug reporting tools for teams that need full control over their data, offering a powerful open-source session replay platform. It can be self-hosted or used via their cloud service, giving organizations flexibility to meet strict compliance or data residency requirements. The platform captures user sessions as videos, along with corresponding console logs and network activity, providing developers with the complete context needed to reproduce and fix bugs efficiently.

This approach eliminates the guesswork from bug reports by showing exactly what a user did leading up to an issue. Unlike purely browser-based tools, its self-hosting capability appeals to companies in regulated industries like finance or healthcare, where data privacy is a primary concern.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Engineering teams in regulated industries, companies prioritizing data privacy, or developers who need an open-source, self-hosted session replay solution.
Standout Feature: The flexibility of deployment is a major advantage, with options for a fully managed cloud service or a self-hosted version that gives complete data control.
Limitations: The self-hosted version requires significant setup and ongoing maintenance overhead compared to fully SaaS solutions. Its out-of-the-box analytics are also less extensive than some commercial competitors.
Pricing: OpenReplay offers a generous Free self-hosted version for up to 1,000 sessions/month. Cloud plans start at $0/month for a serverless option and scale with usage, while the Dedicated cloud plans offer advanced features like conditional recording and configurable retention.

9. Highlight.io

Highlight.io is an open-source monitoring platform that moves beyond simple bug capture by combining session replay with error monitoring, logging, and tracing. This all-in-one approach provides the full context needed to understand not just what bug occurred, but the entire user journey and technical environment leading up to it. It’s a powerful tool for teams that need to connect front-end user behavior with back-end performance data.

The platform automatically captures user sessions, allowing developers to watch a video-like replay of the actions that triggered an error. This visual context is paired with telemetry like console logs and network requests, creating a complete picture for debugging. Its AI-driven error grouping also helps teams prioritize the most impactful issues by consolidating thousands of individual errors into single, actionable items.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Full-stack development teams, site reliability engineers (SREs), and organizations that want a unified view of application health and user experience.
Standout Feature: The combination of session replay with distributed tracing provides an end-to-end view of an issue, from user click to database query.
Limitations: The breadth of its features can introduce a learning curve for teams new to observability platforms, and its pay-as-you-go model requires active management to control costs.
Pricing: Highlight.io offers a generous Free tier with a set number of sessions and errors. Paid plans (Basic, Pro, Enterprise) are usage-based, allowing teams to pay for what they need.

10. Sentry

Sentry is a developer-first monitoring platform that excels at automatically capturing and contextualizing application errors, performance issues, and user interactions. Its core function is to instrument code with one of its 100+ SDKs, allowing it to detect unhandled exceptions and crashes in real-time. This automated approach makes it one of the best bug reporting tools for engineering teams who need deep, code-level insights without manual intervention.

The platform combines error tracking, performance monitoring, and session replay to provide a full picture of an issue's impact. When an error occurs, Sentry groups it with similar events and provides a detailed stack trace, device information, and release data. This immediate context helps engineers pinpoint the root cause quickly, often before users even report a problem. Session Replay adds another layer by showing the exact user actions that led to the bug.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Engineering teams focused on backend, frontend, and mobile applications who need automated, code-level error detection and performance monitoring.
Standout Feature: The powerful issue grouping algorithm intelligently bundles similar errors, reducing alert noise and helping developers prioritize the most impactful bugs.
Limitations: The usage-based pricing model can be complex to manage and may lead to unexpected overages for high-volume applications. It is less of a manual reporting tool and more of an automated monitoring system.
Pricing: Sentry offers a Developer plan (free) for personal projects, a Team plan starting at $26/month, and a Business plan from $80/month, with pricing based on event volume and features.

Sentry fits directly into a developer's workflow, integrating with source control like GitHub to link errors to specific commits and with issue trackers like Jira to create tickets automatically. You can learn more at sentry.io.

11. Rollbar

Rollbar is an error monitoring platform designed to help development teams proactively discover, diagnose, and resolve production errors. It stands out by automatically capturing and grouping exceptions in real-time, providing immediate visibility into application health. This focus on post-deployment error tracking makes it one of the best bug reporting tools for teams that need to manage the noise of production environments and prioritize critical fixes before users report them.

The platform’s intelligent grouping algorithm clusters similar errors into single, actionable items, preventing alert fatigue. It enriches each error report with a full stack trace, request parameters, user data, and browser/OS information. This detailed context allows developers to understand the root cause of an issue without having to manually reproduce it, which is crucial for maintaining application stability.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Backend and full-stack development teams who need automated, real-time error monitoring for live web and mobile applications.
Standout Feature: The predictable pricing model with overage controls helps teams avoid surprise bills by allowing them to set hard limits or budget caps on event volume.
Limitations: It is primarily an error monitoring solution, not a manual bug reporting or session replay tool. It lacks the visual feedback and user-generated reporting capabilities found in other tools.
Pricing: Rollbar offers a generous Free tier with 25,000 monthly events, an Advanced plan at $41/month for more features and data retention, and custom Enterprise plans.

Rollbar’s strength lies in its ability to give engineering teams a high-signal, low-noise feed of production issues. By integrating directly into CI/CD pipelines and tools like Jira, Slack, and PagerDuty, it ensures that critical bugs are triaged and assigned to the right person immediately.

12. BugSnag (by SmartBear)

BugSnag shifts the focus from simple bug logging to proactive stability management. It operates as a full-stack error monitoring and performance platform that helps engineering teams understand the health of their applications through stability scores. By automatically capturing errors across web, mobile, and server environments, it provides a centralized dashboard to prioritize fixes based on user impact and frequency, making it an excellent bug reporting tool for data-driven teams.

The platform excels at grouping errors intelligently and providing rich diagnostic data, including stack traces, device information, and user interaction breadcrumbs. This allows developers to quickly assess the root cause of a crash or performance bottleneck. BugSnag's strength lies in its ability to quantify application health, helping teams set and meet stability targets for new releases.

Key Details & Pricing

Ideal For: Engineering and SRE teams in mid-to-large companies that need to manage application stability across multiple platforms (web, mobile, backend).
Standout Feature: The "Stability Score" provides a clear, real-time metric for application health, which helps teams objectively measure the impact of their bug fixes and releases.
Limitations: The pricing model, which can be based on event volume and performance spans, might be complex for smaller teams to budget for accurately.
Pricing: BugSnag offers a Lite plan at $69/month, a Standard plan starting at $119/month with more features, and an Enterprise plan with on-premise options and advanced security. A 14-day trial is available.

By connecting error data with performance metrics, BugSnag gives a more complete picture of how bugs affect the user experience. Its deep integrations with tools like Jira, Slack, and PagerDuty ensure that critical alerts are routed to the right teams immediately, closing the loop from detection to resolution.

Top 12 Bug Reporting Tools — Feature Comparison

Product	Core features	UX ★	Price & value 💰	Target 👥	Standout ✨
Monito 🏆	Full session capture (clicks, nav, console, HTTP & WebSocket), screen recordings, one-click dev-ready reports, AI insights	★★★★★	💰 Hobby $29/mo (7d) → Pro $49 (unlimited) → Ent $79+/seat; yearly ~20% off	👥 Engineering, QA, Product, Support	🏆 AI root-cause + direct exports to Linear/Jira + Chromium extension
Jam.dev	One-click capture, Instant Replay, SDK + recording links, broad integrations	★★★★☆	💰 Tiered; recording-length limits on low plans	👥 QA, PMs, Support	✨ Low-friction captures & public adoption signal
Marker.io	On-page annotations, session replay, two-way sync, Figma & WP support	★★★★	💰 Agency-focused pricing; advanced analytics on higher tiers	👥 Agencies, web teams, stakeholders	✨ Client-friendly feedback without accounts
BugHerd	Point-and-click element pins, screenshots/video, integrations, exports	★★★★	💰 Mid-tier; unlimited client users across plans	👥 Agencies, marketing/product, UAT teams	✨ Pinned feedback tied to page elements
Usersnap	In-app widgets, screenshots, recordings, micro-surveys, many integrations	★★★	💰 Usage/seat/tier dependent; top features gated	👥 Product teams, customer feedback, QA	✨ Combines surveys + visual bug reports
Bird Eats Bug	Screen + console + network capture, Web SDK (no extension needed), integrations	★★★★	💰 Paid plans w/ unlimited recordings; team limits may raise cost	👥 QA, customer-facing teams, non-technical reporters	✨ Web SDK for in-product reporting without sign-in
LogRocket	High-fidelity session replay, console/network/DOM state, perf metrics	★★★★	💰 Session-volume pricing; can grow costly at scale	👥 Devs, PMs, SREs	✨ Replay + performance insights for complex repros
OpenReplay	Open-source session replay, self-host/cloud, configurable retention & regions	★★★★	💰 Flexible: free self-host → paid cloud/dedicated plans	👥 Teams needing data residency / self-hosting	✨ Self-host friendly + privacy control
Highlight.io	Replay + errors + logs + tracing, AI error grouping, open-source options	★★★★	💰 Generous free/usage-based tiers; enterprise add-ons	👥 Devs seeking all-in-one telemetry	✨ Open-source monitoring + AI grouping
Sentry	Error & performance monitoring, session replay, 100+ SDKs & integrations	★★★★	💰 Usage-based; complex retention/overage choices	👥 Developers, backend/frontend teams	✨ Broad SDK support and dev workflows
Rollbar	Error grouping, real-time alerts, retention & overage controls	★★★★	💰 Transparent low-entry pricing; overage controls	👥 Dev & ops teams	✨ Predictable billing and noise controls
BugSnag	Error & performance monitoring, stability scores, mobile-first tooling	★★★★	💰 Modular tiers; on-prem/enterprise options	👥 Mobile & web devs, stability-focused teams	✨ Stability metrics and mobile support

Stop Chasing Bugs and Start Fixing Them

Choosing the right tool from a list of the best bug reporting tools can feel daunting, but the core objective remains simple: eliminate friction in your development lifecycle. We’ve explored a dozen powerful options, from visual feedback platforms like Marker.io and BugHerd to developer-centric session replay and error monitoring giants like LogRocket and Sentry. The central theme connecting them all is the power of context. A bug report without context is just noise; a bug report with a screenshot, console logs, network requests, and user steps is a clear-cut action plan.

The most significant takeaway is that the "best" tool is rarely a one-size-fits-all solution. It's the one that aligns with your team's specific pain points and existing workflows. A product team gathering feedback from non-technical stakeholders has fundamentally different needs than a QA team performing rigorous regression testing or a developer trying to reproduce an intermittent front-end glitch. Your decision should be guided by who is reporting the bug, who is fixing it, and how much technical detail is required to bridge the gap between them.

Finding Your Perfect Fit: A Final Checklist

Before making your final decision, run through these critical questions to clarify your priorities:

Who is the primary reporter? If it's your customers or clients, tools with simple, user-friendly widgets like Marker.io or Jam.dev are excellent choices. If it’s internal QA or developers, a more feature-rich solution like Monito or Bird Eats Bug might be more appropriate.
What level of technical detail is essential? Do you need basic annotated screenshots, or are complete session replays, console logs, and network details non-negotiable? This is the key difference between visual feedback tools and more robust diagnostic platforms.
How important are integrations? A tool that doesn’t seamlessly connect with your project management system (like Jira, Asana, or Linear) will create more work, not less. Double-check that your chosen tool integrates smoothly with your existing stack.
What is your budget and team size? Many tools offer generous free tiers or plans for small teams, while others are built for enterprise-scale needs. Align your choice with your current budget and anticipate how it will scale as your team grows.

Implementation and Adoption: The Final Hurdle

Selecting a tool is only half the battle. Successful implementation hinges on team-wide adoption and clear process documentation. Once you've chosen one of these best bug reporting tools, dedicate time to training your team. Show your support agents how to use the browser extension, walk your developers through interpreting session replays, and establish a clear triage process within your project management software.

The goal is to make reporting a bug as effortless as possible. When the process is easy and the resulting ticket is rich with information, everyone wins. Developers spend less time guessing and more time building, QA can report issues with confidence, and product managers get a clearer picture of application health. By investing in a dedicated bug reporting solution, you are not just buying software; you are investing in a more efficient, collaborative, and ultimately more productive engineering culture.

Ready to see how an all-in-one platform can consolidate your bug reporting and monitoring efforts? Monito combines visual feedback, session replay, error monitoring, and performance metrics into a single, cohesive workflow. Stop juggling multiple tools and start fixing bugs faster with the complete context you need. Explore Monito today.